hammer/notes
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update network-app docs: new stack (Flutter, Elysia, Bun, Postgres)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Hammer
2026-01-27 02:34:23 +00:00
parent d390720986
commit a05cead8ed
4 changed files with 574 additions and 1325 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

479
projects/network-app/feasibility.md
View File

@@ -1,460 +1,73 @@
# The Network App - Technical Feasibility Assessment
# The Network App — Feasibility Assessment
**Date:** 2025-06-26
**Purpose:** Evaluate technical approach, architecture, and development requirements
**Last Updated:** 2026-01-27
**Status:** ✅ Feasible — Proceed with MVP
---
## Executive Summary
## Stack Validation
The Network App is **technically feasible** with the proposed stack (Swift/SwiftUI, Firebase, Claude AI). The project is moderate complexity with well-understood patterns. Main challenges are AI integration quality and compliance implementation. Estimated timeline: **12-16 weeks for MVP**.
| Component | Choice | Maturity | Risk |
|-----------|--------|----------|------|
| Flutter | Stable | Production-ready | Low |
| Elysia + Bun | Growing | v1.0+, stable | Low |
| PostgreSQL | Mature | Industry standard | Low |
| Drizzle | Stable | Production-ready | Low |
| BetterAuth | Newer | v1.0+, active dev | Low-Medium |
| LangChain.js | Mature | Widely adopted | Low |
| Dokploy | Stable | Self-hosted PaaS | Low |
**Overall Risk:** Low — All core technologies are production-ready.
---
## 1. Swift/SwiftUI Architecture Recommendations
## MVP Timeline Estimate
### Platform Choice: Native iOS ✅
| Phase | Scope | Duration |
|-------|-------|----------|
| 1. Setup | Repos, auth, DB schema | 1 week |
| 2. Client CRUD | Backend + Flutter UI | 2 weeks |
| 3. Search & Events | Filters, birthday tracking | 1 week |
| 4. AI Integration | LangChain email generation | 1 week |
| 5. Polish | Testing, bug fixes, deploy | 1 week |
**Why Native:**
- Best performance for data-heavy CRM
- Full access to iOS features (biometrics, contacts, notifications)
- SwiftUI is mature and production-ready (iOS 16+)
- Offline-first capabilities easier to implement
- Better for sensitive data handling
**Why NOT Cross-Platform:**
- Single platform requirement (iOS first)
- Native gives compliance advantages
- No need to compromise on UX
### Recommended Architecture: MVVM + Clean Architecture
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Presentation │
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ Views │ │ ViewModels │ │ Router │ │
│ │ (SwiftUI) │ │ (ObsObj) │ │ (Coordinat) │ │
│ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Domain │
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ Use Cases │ │ Entities │ │ Repositories│ │
│ │ │ │ (Models) │ │ (Protocols) │ │
│ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Data │
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ Firebase │ │ Claude │ │ Local │ │
│ │ Service │ │ Service │ │ Cache │ │
│ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
### Key SwiftUI Patterns
1. **State Management:** Combine + ObservableObject
2. **Navigation:** NavigationStack (iOS 16+)
3. **Data Flow:** Single source of truth in ViewModels
4. **Dependency Injection:** Protocol-based for testability
### iOS Version Target
- **Minimum:** iOS 16.0
- **Reason:** NavigationStack, modern SwiftUI features
- **Coverage:** ~95% of active iPhones
**Total: 6-8 weeks for MVP**
---
## 2. Firebase Structure for Client Data
## Cost Estimate (Monthly)
### Why Firebase ✅
**Advantages:**
- Real-time sync built-in
- Offline persistence automatic
- Authentication included
- Cloud Functions for backend logic
- Good security rules system
- Scales automatically
**Considerations:**
- NoSQL requires careful data modeling
- Compliance certifications available (SOC 2, ISO 27001)
- Data residency options exist
### Firestore Data Model
```
users/
{userId}/
profile: { name, email, settings }
subscription: { tier, expires }
clients/
{clientId}/
userId: string (owner reference)
basic: {
firstName, lastName, email, phone
address: { street, city, state, zip }
}
professional: {
company, role, industry
}
personal: {
birthday, anniversary
interests: []
family: { spouse, children: [] }
preferences: {}
}
notes: [] // Array of timestamped notes
tags: []
matchPreferences: {
excludeFromMatching: boolean
excludeClientIds: []
}
metadata: {
createdAt, updatedAt, lastContactedAt
}
communications/
{communicationId}/
userId: string
clientId: string
type: "email" | "newsletter" | "birthday"
status: "draft" | "approved" | "sent"
aiGenerated: {
content: string
generatedAt: timestamp
promptUsed: string
}
finalContent: string
sentAt: timestamp
matches/
{matchId}/
userId: string
client1Id: string
client2Id: string
aiReasoning: string
score: number
status: "suggested" | "approved" | "introduced" | "rejected"
introducedAt: timestamp
outcome: string
events/
{eventId}/
userId: string
clientId: string
type: "birthday" | "anniversary" | "followup" | "custom"
date: timestamp
recurring: boolean
reminderDays: number
lastTriggered: timestamp
```
### Security Rules Strategy
```javascript
// Firestore Security Rules (simplified)
rules_version = '2';
service cloud.firestore {
match /databases/{database}/documents {
// Users can only access their own data
match /clients/{clientId} {
allow read, write: if request.auth != null
&& resource.data.userId == request.auth.uid;
}
// Audit log - write only
match /auditLog/{logId} {
allow create: if request.auth != null;
allow read: if false; // Only via admin SDK
}
}
}
```
### Offline Strategy
1. **Firestore Persistence:** Enable by default
2. **Optimistic Updates:** UI updates immediately
3. **Conflict Resolution:** Last-write-wins for most fields
4. **Sync Indicator:** Show pending changes to user
| Service | Cost |
|---------|------|
| VM (Dokploy host) | Already owned |
| PostgreSQL | Included (self-hosted) |
| Claude API (~200 emails) | ~$3-5 |
| Resend (3k emails free) | $0 |
| **Total** | ~$5/month |
---
## 3. Claude AI Integration Approach
## Key Decisions
### API Integration Architecture
```
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ iOS App │────▶│ Firebase │────▶│ Claude API │
│ │ │ Functions │ │ │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
│
API Key secured
in Cloud Functions
```
**Why Cloud Functions Proxy:**
- API key never on device
- Rate limiting and cost control
- Audit logging for compliance
- Can cache/optimize requests
### Claude Use Cases & Prompts
#### 1. Personalized Email Generation
```
System: You are a professional wealth advisor writing to a valued client.
Maintain a warm but professional tone. Incorporate personal details naturally.
Context:
- Advisor name: {advisorName}
- Client: {clientName}
- Their interests: {interests}
- Recent notes: {recentNotes}
- Purpose: {emailPurpose}
Generate a personalized email that feels genuine, not templated.
```
#### 2. Client Match Suggestions
```
System: You are analyzing client profiles to identify valuable networking
opportunities. Only suggest matches that would genuinely benefit both parties.
Client A: {profileA}
Client B: {profileB}
Evaluate potential match:
1. What shared interests or complementary needs exist?
2. How might they benefit from knowing each other?
3. Confidence score (1-10) with reasoning
4. Suggested introduction approach
Output as JSON: { score, reasoning, introductionSuggestion }
```
#### 3. Birthday/Event Messages
```
System: Generate a thoughtful birthday message from a wealth advisor to
their client. Should feel personal, not generic.
Client: {clientName}
Relationship tenure: {yearsSinceClient}
Interests: {interests}
Last interaction: {lastNote}
Keep it brief (2-3 sentences) and sincere.
```
### Cost Estimation
| Use Case | Tokens/Request | Requests/Month | Monthly Cost |
|----------|----------------|----------------|--------------|
| Email generation | ~800 | 200 | ~$2.40 |
| Match analysis | ~1200 | 100 | ~$1.80 |
| Birthday messages | ~300 | 50 | ~$0.45 |
| **Total estimated** | | | **~$5-10/user** |
*Based on Claude 3.5 Sonnet pricing ($3/M input, $15/M output)*
### Error Handling
1. **Timeout:** 30-second limit, show "AI thinking..."
2. **Failure:** Graceful fallback to templates
3. **Rate Limits:** Queue and retry with exponential backoff
4. **Content Filtering:** Review AI output before displaying
1. **Cross-platform (Flutter)** over iOS-only — Serves both platforms from one codebase
2. **Self-hosted** over Firebase — Full control, predictable costs, no vendor lock-in
3. **LangChain** over direct API — Model flexibility for future
4. **Lean MVP** — Core features only, iterate based on David's feedback
---
## 4. Security & Compliance Considerations
## Risks & Mitigations
### GDPR Compliance
| Requirement | Implementation |
|-------------|----------------|
| Right to Access | Export all client data as JSON/PDF |
| Right to Deletion | Hard delete with cascade (Firebase Admin SDK) |
| Data Portability | Standard export format |
| Consent Tracking | Store consent timestamps per client |
| Data Minimization | Only collect necessary fields |
### HIPAA Considerations
If storing health-related notes (e.g., "client mentioned health concerns"):
1. **BAA with Firebase:** Google offers BAA for Cloud/Firebase
2. **Encryption:** AES-256 at rest (Firebase default)
3. **Access Logging:** Audit trail for all data access
4. **Employee Training:** Document handling procedures
### Encryption Strategy
| Layer | Method |
|-------|--------|
| In Transit | TLS 1.3 (Firebase default) |
| At Rest | AES-256 (Firebase default) |
| Sensitive Fields | Additional client-side encryption (optional) |
| Local Cache | iOS Keychain for sensitive data |
### Authentication Flow
```
┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ App Launch │───▶│ Biometric │───▶│ Firebase │
│ │ │ (FaceID) │ │ Auth │
└──────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └──────────────┘
│
Fallback to PIN
```
### Audit Logging
Log these events to a write-only collection:
- User login/logout
- Client record created/modified/deleted
- AI generation requested
- Export performed
- Data deletion requested
| Risk | Probability | Mitigation |
|------|-------------|------------|
| BetterAuth edge cases | Low | Active community, can fallback to Lucia |
| AI response quality | Medium | Prompt iteration, human review before send |
| Bun compatibility issues | Low | Mature ecosystem, fallback to Node if needed |
---
## 5. Complexity Assessment
## Recommendation
### Feature Complexity Breakdown
**Proceed with development.** Stack is solid, timeline is reasonable, costs are minimal.
| Feature | Complexity | Effort (days) | Risk |
|---------|------------|---------------|------|
| Client CRUD | Low | 5 | Low |
| Search & Filters | Medium | 4 | Low |
| Firebase Auth | Low | 2 | Low |
| Client Profile UI | Medium | 6 | Low |
| AI Email Generation | Medium | 5 | Medium |
| AI Matching | High | 8 | Medium |
| Birthday Tracking | Low | 3 | Low |
| Push Notifications | Medium | 3 | Low |
| Offline Support | Medium | 4 | Medium |
| Compliance Features | Medium | 5 | Medium |
| Settings & Preferences | Low | 2 | Low |
### Technical Risks
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-------------|--------|------------|
| AI quality inconsistent | Medium | High | Prompt iteration, human review |
| Firebase scaling costs | Low | Medium | Monitor usage, set alerts |
| iOS approval delays | Low | Medium | Follow guidelines strictly |
| Offline sync conflicts | Medium | Medium | Clear conflict resolution UX |
---
## 6. Timeline Estimate
### Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-4)
- Project setup, architecture
- Firebase configuration
- Authentication flow
- Basic client CRUD
- **Deliverable:** App shell with auth and data persistence
### Phase 2: Core Features (Weeks 5-8)
- Client profile UI (full)
- Search and filtering
- Notes and tags
- Event/birthday tracking
- Push notifications
- **Deliverable:** Functional CRM without AI
### Phase 3: AI Integration (Weeks 9-12)
- Cloud Functions setup
- AI email generation
- AI matching algorithm
- Review/approval workflows
- **Deliverable:** Full AI features working
### Phase 4: Polish & Compliance (Weeks 13-16)
- Compliance features (export, delete)
- Audit logging
- UI polish and edge cases
- Testing and bug fixes
- App Store preparation
- **Deliverable:** Production-ready app
### Total Estimate: 12-16 weeks
**With buffer for unknowns:** 16-20 weeks
---
## 7. Technology Recommendations
### Recommended Stack
| Component | Technology | Rationale |
|-----------|------------|-----------|
| Language | Swift 5.9+ | Modern, safe, performant |
| UI | SwiftUI | Declarative, less code |
| Architecture | MVVM | SwiftUI natural fit |
| Backend | Firebase | Real-time, offline, scales |
| Database | Firestore | Flexible schema, good sync |
| Auth | Firebase Auth | Turnkey, secure |
| Functions | Cloud Functions | Secure AI proxy |
| AI | Claude API | Quality, context length |
| Analytics | Firebase Analytics | Integrated, free |
| Crash Reporting | Firebase Crashlytics | Integrated, free |
### Development Tools
- **Xcode 15+** - Latest SwiftUI features
- **Swift Package Manager** - Dependency management
- **SwiftLint** - Code quality
- **Firebase Emulator** - Local development
### Third-Party Libraries
Keep minimal:
- Firebase iOS SDK
- (Optional) Kingfisher for image caching
- (Optional) SwiftUI introspect for edge cases
---
## 8. Conclusion
### Feasibility: ✅ HIGH
The project is well within established technology patterns. No experimental tech required.
### Key Success Factors
1. **AI Prompt Engineering** - Invest time in quality prompts
2. **UX for AI Review** - Make human approval frictionless
3. **Offline-First** - Critical for mobile advisor use
4. **Compliance Documentation** - Start early, not late
### Recommended Next Steps
1. Finalize scope and budget
2. Set up Firebase project
3. Create Figma designs for key screens
4. Begin Phase 1 development
### Cost Summary
| Item | One-Time | Monthly |
|------|----------|---------|
| Development (16 wks) | $15-40K* | - |
| Firebase (100 users) | - | $25-50 |
| Claude API (per user) | - | $5-10 |
| Apple Developer | $99/year | - |
| **Total Year 1** | ~$15-40K | ~$75-150 |
*Development cost varies significantly based on who builds it
Next step: Set up repos and scaffold projects.